All glories to Srila Prabhupada's ORIGINAL books! Jayadvaita Swami has started his own "newsgroup" on com which only he can post to. He aims to "explain"why he "revised and enlarged" Srila Prabhupada's Bhagavad-gita As It Is even though he openly admits Srila Prabhupada "never asked us to re-edit the book...". He has posted one "explanation" of a correction to an obvious typographical error... Actually he corrected many real typographical errors in the original book, perhaps a little more than one hundred, but he made more than five thousand changes! Jayadvaita does not seem to realize no one is complaining about the correction of real typographical errors... Srila Prabhupada wanted the BBT editors to make sure the books were correct grammatically but he did not give anyone the authority to Revise and Enlarge his books or change his words or change the style! So Jayadvaita can go on and post a little more than one hundred articles to his "newsgroup" describing his one hundred or so bona fide corrections. But what about the other 4,900 changes?
The point he has never addressed in any of his "explanations" is why he has produced a "Bhagavad-gita" which contains hundreds of changes that COMPLETELY alter the meaning of the book when compared to the original version Srila Prabhupada personally read from daily, gave all his classes from and did not ask anyone to "revise and enlarge." Jayadvaita's book is completely different from Srila Prabhuapda's. Where is the authority for all these changes?
Srila Prabhupada gave no authority for such changes... So we will continue looking at some of the changes.
Bg 2.57 T ORIGINAL:
He who is without attachment, who does not rejoice when he obtains good, nor lament when he obtains evil, is firmly fixed in perfect knowledge.
Bg 2.57 T REVISED & ENLARGED:
In the material world, one who is unaffected by whatever good or evil he may obtain, neither praising it nor despising it, is firmly fixed in perfect knowledge.
(10) Here the principle of being without attachment is completely removed from Jayadvaita's translation. Of course he may say he has some secret manuscript he has got this information from or he may have studied the Sanskrit and by his great learning in the Sanskrit language decided there was no attachment in the original Sanskrit. But where did he get the authority from to retranslate this verse?
Bg 2.61 P ORIGINAL:
The Yoga-sutra also prescribes meditation on Visnu, and not meditation on the void. The so-called yogis who meditate on something which is not the Visnu form simply waste their time in a vain search after some phantasmagoria. We have to be Krsna conscious--devoted to the Personality of Godhead. This is the aim of the real yoga.
Bg 2.61 P REVISED & ENLARGED:
The Yoga-sutra also prescribes meditation on Visnu, and not meditation on the void. The so-called yogis who meditate on something which is not on the Visnu platform simply waste their time in a vain search after some phantasmagoria. We have to be Krsna conscious--devoted to the Personality of Godhead. This is the aim of the real yoga.
(11) Just see how he works! He has not even deleted any words at all here! He has just added in "on" and "plat" and see the effect it has! The original says anyone who meditates on something other than the Visnu form is wasting his time, but Jayadvaita has to adjust this as what about the impersonalists? They meditate on the impersonal form, etc... Surely they're not wasting their time?? So has to change Srila Prabhupada's purport...
Bg 2.66 T ORIGINAL:
One who is not in transcendental consciousness can have neither a controlled mind nor a steady intelligence, without which there is no possibility of peace. And how can there be any happiness without peace?
Bg 2.66 T REVISED & ENLARGED:
One who is not connected with the Supreme [in Krsna consciousness] can have neither transcendental intelligence nor a steady mind, without which there is no possibility of peace. And how can there be any happiness without peace?
(12) "A controlled mind..." In the original we can clearly see there's no possibility of peace and happiness without a controlled mind, but in Jayadvaita's translation the mind control has become a "steady mind?" He has also made it very confusing. The meaning is no where near as clear as the original. Who said Jayadvaita was making "better English?" He's making bewildering English!
Tamala Krsna: 66: "One who is not in transcendental consciousness can have neither a controlled mind nor steady intelligence, without which there is no possibility of peace, and how can there be any happiness without peace?"
Prabhupada: Everyone in this material world, they are after peace, but they don't want to control the senses. It is not possible. Just like you are diseased, and doctor says that "You take this medicine, you take this diet," but you cannot control. You are taking anything you like, against the instruction of the physician. Then how you can be cured? Similarly, we want cure of the chaotic condition of this material world, we want peace and prosperity, but we are not ready to control the senses. We do not know how to control the senses. We do not know the real yogic principle of controlling the senses. So there is no possibility of peace. Kutah santir ayuktasya. The exact word is there in the Bhagavad-gita. If you are not engaged in Krsna consciousness, there is no possibility of peace. Artificially, you may try for it. It is not possible. Go on. (681219BG.LA)
Just see! Srila Prabhupada heard this verse personally and immediately he is preaching on the point of sense control! Where does he say "Get Jayadvaita Swami to delete mind control from the translation?" No. He does not say that. He preaches on sense control!
Bg 3.3 T ORIGINAL:
The Blessed Lord said: O sinless Arjuna, I have already explained that there are two classes of men who realize the self. Some are inclined to understand Him by empirical, philosophical speculation, and others are inclined to know Him by devotional work.
Bg 3.3 T REVISED & ENLARGED:
The Supreme Personality of Godhead said: O sinless Arjuna, I have already explained that there are two classes of men who try to realize the self. Some are inclined to understand it by empirical, philosophical speculation, and others by devotional service.
(12) Just a few of Jayadvaita Swami's little "corrections..."